From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "W. Michael Petullo" Subject: Re: Proposal: vif-local Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:06:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20110510160631.GA17482@imp.local> References: <20110505171542.GA17115@imp.local> <1304671321.26692.117.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110506170602.GA4198@imp.local> <1304930722.26692.196.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110509171011.GA15962@imp.local> <1305014526.26692.238.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1305014526.26692.238.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> Lastly we need a Signed-off-by per the DCO (section 11 of >>> http://lwn.net/Articles/139918/) as well as a suitable changelog message >>> before we can apply any patch. >> Please see the attached patch. >> Allow for site-specific hooks that will be executed after Xen initializes >> a vif. This allows an administrator to specify custom firewall rules or >> other special configuration parameters. >> >> Signed-off-by: W. Michael Petullo > This is against 4.1? can you check that it applies to xen-unstable.hg > please, other than that: > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell I pulled xen-unstable.hg from Mercurial and the patch applied cleanly. The modified scripts were identical to those resulting from applying the patch against 4.1.0. -- Mike :wq