From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5 Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:32:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20110510173216.GA7871@dumpdata.com> References: <20110503042158.GA5206@imp.local> <20110503131808.GA11069@imp.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Steven Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "W. Michael Petullo" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:11:42PM -0400, Steven wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:18 AM, W. Michael Petullo wrot= e: > >> The link does not work. > > > > Sorry, the link should have been: > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-xen-passive-oprofile= /linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz Is there a git of this by any chance? BTW, when I ran diffstat on this I = saw .. arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h.orig | 565 ++++++ arch/x86/xen/mmu.c.orig | 2486 +++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++ include/linux/oprofile.h.orig | 211 ++ I don't think the .orig file are neccessary?