* OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5
@ 2011-05-03 4:21 W. Michael Petullo
2011-05-03 4:33 ` Steven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: W. Michael Petullo @ 2011-05-03 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
I have ported Anil's passive profile-capable OProfile patch to Linux
2.6.39.rc5.git5. Please see:
http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile/linux-2.6.38-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz
With this patch applied to Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5, I can perform passive
profiling on an unprivileged Xen domain.
--
Mike
:wq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5
2011-05-03 4:21 OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5 W. Michael Petullo
@ 2011-05-03 4:33 ` Steven
2011-05-03 13:18 ` W. Michael Petullo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven @ 2011-05-03 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W. Michael Petullo; +Cc: xen-devel
Hi, Michael,
The link does not work.
And is this a dom0 kernel?
- Hui
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:21 AM, W. Michael Petullo <mike@flyn.org> wrote:
> I have ported Anil's passive profile-capable OProfile patch to Linux
> 2.6.39.rc5.git5. Please see:
>
> http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile/linux-2.6.38-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz
>
> With this patch applied to Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5, I can perform passive
> profiling on an unprivileged Xen domain.
>
> --
> Mike
>
> :wq
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5
2011-05-03 4:33 ` Steven
@ 2011-05-03 13:18 ` W. Michael Petullo
2011-05-03 21:11 ` Steven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: W. Michael Petullo @ 2011-05-03 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven; +Cc: xen-devel
> The link does not work.
Sorry, the link should have been:
http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-xen-passive-oprofile/linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz
> And is this a dom0 kernel?
Yes. This is a patch against linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5. This feature is
relavent when Linux is built to be run in Dom0.
--
Mike
:wq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5
2011-05-03 13:18 ` W. Michael Petullo
@ 2011-05-03 21:11 ` Steven
2011-05-10 17:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven @ 2011-05-03 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W. Michael Petullo; +Cc: xen-devel
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:18 AM, W. Michael Petullo <mike@flyn.org> wrote:
>> The link does not work.
>
> Sorry, the link should have been:
>
> http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-xen-passive-oprofile/linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz
>
>> And is this a dom0 kernel?
>
> Yes. This is a patch against linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5. This feature is
> relavent when Linux is built to be run in Dom0.
This is cool, given that Jeremy's dom0 kernel is based on only 2.6.32.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
- Hui
>
> --
> Mike
>
> :wq
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5
2011-05-03 21:11 ` Steven
@ 2011-05-10 17:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-10 17:45 ` Steven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2011-05-10 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven; +Cc: xen-devel, W. Michael Petullo
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:11:42PM -0400, Steven wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:18 AM, W. Michael Petullo <mike@flyn.org> wrote:
> >> The link does not work.
> >
> > Sorry, the link should have been:
> >
> > http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-xen-passive-oprofile/linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz
Is there a git of this by any chance? BTW, when I ran diffstat on this I saw
..
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h.orig | 565 ++++++
arch/x86/xen/mmu.c.orig | 2486 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/oprofile.h.orig | 211 ++
I don't think the .orig file are neccessary?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5
2011-05-10 17:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
@ 2011-05-10 17:45 ` Steven
2011-05-10 17:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven @ 2011-05-10 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: xen-devel, W. Michael Petullo
The git repository is https://github.com/avsm/linux-2.6.32-xen-oprofile
But it is for 2.6.32.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:11:42PM -0400, Steven wrote:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:18 AM, W. Michael Petullo <mike@flyn.org> wrote:
>> >> The link does not work.
>> >
>> > Sorry, the link should have been:
>> >
>> > http://www.flyn.org/patches/linux-xen-passive-oprofile/linux-2.6.39.rc5.git5-xen-passive-oprofile.patch.gz
>
> Is there a git of this by any chance? BTW, when I ran diffstat on this I saw
>
> ..
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h.orig | 565 ++++++
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c.orig | 2486 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/oprofile.h.orig | 211 ++
>
> I don't think the .orig file are neccessary?
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-10 18:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-03 4:21 OProfile patch for Linux 2.6.39.rc5.git5 W. Michael Petullo
2011-05-03 4:33 ` Steven
2011-05-03 13:18 ` W. Michael Petullo
2011-05-03 21:11 ` Steven
2011-05-10 17:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-10 17:45 ` Steven
2011-05-10 17:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-10 18:10 ` Steven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).