xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, crrodriguez@suse.de,
	nhorman@tuxdriver.com, bwalle@suse.de, pbrobinson@gmail.com,
	notting@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, anibal@debian.org
Subject: Re: irqbalance seg faults with 2.6.38 or later kernels [patch + solution included] if running under Xen hypervisor
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 09:10:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110511131058.GA4130@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DCA62150200007800040EEA@vpn.id2.novell.com>

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:16:53AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.05.11 at 02:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > The reason behind it is that irqbalance parses the /proc/interrupts
> > and whenever it hits something it can't understand:
> > 
> >  RES:  191614137   73904910    Rescheduling interrupts
> > 
> > It will count the number of interrupts towards the IRQ 0. That IRQ does 
> > exist
> > when the kernel boots under baremetal:
> > 
> >   0:         46          0       IO-APIC-edge      timer
> > 
> > but under Xen, the timer interrupts are initialized much later:
> > 
> >  272:   41197188          0        xen-percpu-virq      timer0
> > 
> > and the first IRQ that is used is not zero, but rather one:
> > 
> >    1:      73037          0          0          0          0          0  
> > xen-pirq-ioapic-edge  i8042
> > 
> > so when irqbalance tries to account for the IRQ 'RES' to the IRQ 0
> > it fails and segfaults. The attached patch fixes it for whoever else is
> > hitting this problem.
> 
> In the svn snapshot I have, I see
> 
> 		/* lines with letters in front are special, like NMI count. Ignore */
> 		if (!(line[0]==' ' || (line[0]>='0' && line[0]<='9')))
> 			break;
> 
> which I would think should be taking care of your problem (or
> I mis-read your description), and which was there already before

Not anymore. In kernels 2.6.37:

           CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4       CPU5       
.. snip.
NMI:          0          0          0          0   Non-maskable interrupts
LOC:   12413629   12858323   16296183   11098466   Local timer interrupts

In 2.6.38 and later:
            CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4       CPU5       
 TRM:          0          0          0          0          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
 THR:          0          0          0          0          0          0   Threshold APIC interrupts
 MCE:          0          0          0          0          0          0   Machine check exceptions

They added in a space before the name. The check you mentioned
above could be augmented for this of course, as another solution
for this.

> 0.56. Or are you perhaps having the problem because you have
> 1000+ interrupts, thus causing even the non-numeric strings to
> get space padded on their left? In that case I'd rather think above
> check should be either improved or removed (replaced by your
> solution).
> 
> > I am not sure who the upstream maintainer is for this so
> > I am sending this patch to the different distros as well.
> 
> Copying Neil and Arjan.
> 
> Jan
> 
> > 
> > --- irqbalance-0.56.orig/procinterrupts.c	2010-06-10 10:45:55.000000000 -0400
> > +++ irqbalance-0.56/procinterrupts.c	2011-05-10 20:22:06.897465003 -0400
> > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void parse_proc_interrupts(void)
> >  		int cpunr;
> >  		int	 number;
> >  		uint64_t count;
> > -		char *c, *c2;
> > +		char *c, *c2, *err;
> >  
> >  		if (getline(&line, &size, file)==0)
> >  			break;
> > @@ -64,7 +64,11 @@ void parse_proc_interrupts(void)
> >  			continue;
> >  		*c = 0;
> >  		c++;
> > -		number = strtoul(line, NULL, 10);
> > +		number = strtoul(line, &err, 10);
> > +		/* Man page says that if that happens and number == 0, then it
> > +		 * failed to parse. */
> > +		if (err == line && number == 0)
> > +			continue;
> >  		count = 0;
> >  		cpunr = 0;
> >  
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-11 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-11  0:33 irqbalance seg faults with 2.6.38 or later kernels [patch + solution included] if running under Xen hypervisor Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-11  8:16 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-11 13:10   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-05-11 13:41     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110511131058.GA4130@dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=anibal@debian.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bwalle@suse.de \
    --cc=crrodriguez@suse.de \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=notting@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).