From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@hotmail.com>
Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Too much VCPUS makes domU high CPU utiliazation
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:39:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110518163950.GA20543@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <blu157-w3926296290D038E14CB39ADA8F0@phx.gbl>
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:19:11AM +0800, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
>
> HI:
>
> I have a host with 16 physical CPUS. Dom0 has 4 VCPUS.
>
> When only start a domU-A(windows 2003 x86 64rc 2) with 16 VCPUS, it starts quickly and eveything is fine.
>
> But if I first start domU-B, which has 2VCPUS, domU-C 4VCPUS, and domU-D 8 VCPUS, later I start DomUA again,
> (so we have total 34 VCPUS, plus dom0), it will takes very long time for domU-A to start ,and during the start, its CPU
> utilizaiton is around 800% from xm top, after its start, it response very slow in VNC, ans CPU utiliazation keeps high.
> And right after I destoy other 3 domUs, domUA CPU drops to normal.
You might be missing some patches for the Dom0 irq round-robin code. Is your Dom0 2.6.32 pvops?
Look for these patches in your git log:
xen: events: Remove redundant clear of l2i at end of round-robin loop
xen: events: Make round-robin scan fairer by snapshotting each l2 word once only
xen: events: Clean up round-robin evtchn scan.
xen: events: Make last processed event channel a per-cpu variable.
xen: events: Process event channels notifications in round-robin order.
>
> It might relate to CPU schedule, btw, my xen is 4.0.1.
>
> Any comments?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-18 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BAY0-MC1-F215criL7a002cc34e@bay0-mc1-f21.Bay0.hotmail.com>
2011-05-18 16:19 ` Too much VCPUS makes domU high CPU utiliazation MaoXiaoyun
2011-05-18 16:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-05-19 2:35 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-05-19 3:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-19 16:23 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-05-19 23:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-20 15:51 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-05-22 2:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-21 3:43 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-05-22 2:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-22 7:45 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-05-24 11:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-19 16:21 ` George Dunlap
2011-05-19 16:29 ` MaoXiaoyun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110518163950.GA20543@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tinnycloud@hotmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).