From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for
	xen-unstable
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:44:06 +0200
Message-ID: <20110520074406.GA13958@aepfle.de>
References: <patchbomb.1305831919@probook.site>
	<4DD6369302000078000425E2@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DD6369302000078000425E2@vpn.id2.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, May 20, Jan Beulich wrote:

> >>> On 19.05.11 at 21:05, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> wrote:
> > The following series fix compile errors with gcc 4.6.
> > Please review if each change is correct.
> 
> Hmm, this large amount of changes makes we wonder whether we
> shouldn't simply turn of the unused-but-set-variable warning
> altogether, or at least not have it be an error. Not the least
> because I'm not sure it'd be nice to backport all of these changes
> into older trees (which obviously would suffer mostly the same
> problems when built with 4.6 or newer).

At least the 4.1 branch should receive the relevant changes for gcc 4.6.
I can send a similar series for that branch.

Olaf