From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:10:44 +0200
Message-ID: <20110523111044.GA22029@aepfle.de>
References: <osstest-7147-mainreport@xen.org>
	<C9FDF91A.1AC1F%keir.xen@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C9FDF91A.1AC1F%keir.xen@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sat, May 21, Keir Fraser wrote:

> Related to the -Wno-unused-but-set-variable patch. But this is weird because
> the compiler runs many times with this option quite happily, before failing
> on it as an unrecognised option much later in the build (building qemu in
> this case, or stubdom in the case of xen-unstable). Any ideas?

I will look at this today.

Olaf