From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] libxl: Add 'e820_host' option to config file Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:52:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20110524175238.GB6480@dumpdata.com> References: <19931.58377.306007.167357@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19931.58377.306007.167357@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 05:59:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4] libxl: Add 'e820_host' option to config file"): > > libxl: Add 'e820_host' option to config file. > > One of these patches, when built on lenny i386, produces this: > > libxl_pci.c: In function 'e820_sanitize': > libxl_pci.c:1129: error: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 9 has type 'uint64_t' > libxl_pci.c:1129: error: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 10 has type 'uint64_t' > libxl_pci.c:1129: error: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 11 has type 'uint64_t' > libxl_pci.c:1129: error: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 12 has type 'uint64_t' > libxl_pci.c:1246: error: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 8 has type 'uint64_t' > libxl_pci.c:1246: error: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 9 has type 'uint64_t' > make: *** [libxl_pci.o] Error 1 Duh. Please see the patch below: # HG changeset patch # Parent fee83662893a212c67c8f2fb71317e874e61dcd0 diff -r fee83662893a tools/libxl/libxl_pci.c --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_pci.c Tue May 24 11:32:17 2011 -0400 +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_pci.c Tue May 24 13:49:07 2011 -0400 @@ -1122,10 +1122,10 @@ static int e820_sanitize(libxl_ctx *ctx, ram_end = e820[idx].addr + e820[idx].size; idx ++; - LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_DEBUG, "Memory: %ldkB End of RAM: 0x%lx (PFN) " \ - "Delta: %ldkB, PCI start: %ldkB (0x%lx PFN), Balloon %ldkB\n", - map_limitkb, ram_end >> 12, delta_kb, start_kb ,start >> 12, - balloon_kb); + LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_DEBUG, "Memory: %"PRIu64"kB End of RAM: 0x%"PRIx64" (PFN) " \ + "Delta: %"PRIu64"kB, PCI start: %"PRIu64"kB (0x%"PRIx64" PFN), Balloon %"PRIu64"kB\n", + (uint64_t)map_limitkb, ram_end >> 12, delta_kb, start_kb ,start >> 12, + (uint64_t)balloon_kb); /* This whole code below is to guard against if the Intel IGD is passed into @@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ static int e820_sanitize(libxl_ctx *ctx, nr = idx; for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { - LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_DEBUG, ":\t[%lx -> %lx] %s", + LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_DEBUG, ":\t[%"PRIx64" -> %"PRIx64"] %s", e820[i].addr >> 12, (e820[i].addr + e820[i].size) >> 12, e820_names(e820[i].type)); }