From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, stse+xen@fsing.rootsland.net
Subject: Re: Re: Linux 3.0-rc1 - what Xen components went in.
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:07:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110616150706.GA6275@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110616T113336.GA.bd449.stse@fsing.rootsland.net>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:48:20AM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:12:24PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >- Xen block backend. Yes, it is in!
>
> I tried 3.0-rc2 as a Dom0 kernel, but I have problems with the block
> backend support.
> Both Dom0 and DomU are Debian/Testing systems. XEN version is 4.1.0.
>
> The 3.0-rc2 compiled and started without problems, even the DomU
> started. But when I looked at the DomU console I noticed that the
> system had problems with the filesystems. ext3 and ext4 partitions
> produced journal errors and got mounted read only.
Hmm, are barriers somehow being turned on? (They shouldn't). It would
be helpfull if you included the error logs.
>
> Going back to my 2.6.34.8 with xen patches the DomU problems vanished.
So using the older Dom0. Are there any errors/warnings reported by
the frontend? Is there a difference in the dmesg output from the DomU
booted on 2.6.34 vs 3.0?
>
> Here is the XEN configuration part for the DomU block devices:
>
> disk = [ 'phy:mapper/mroot,xvda1,w', 'phy:mapper/mswap,xvda2,w',
> 'phy:mapper/mvar,xvda5,w', 'phy:mapper/msquid,xvda6,w',
> 'phy:mapper/musr,xvda7,w', 'phy:mapper/mhome,xvda8,w' ]
>
that is pretty much how I've it too. Well:
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-xfs,xvda,w', 'phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-ext4,xvdb,w','phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-ext3,xvdc,w', 'phy:/dev/vg_guest_1/data-swap ,xvdd,w']
I don't try to put disks as partitions. Let me try that. Are the sizes
that xne-blkfront report the same?
> Do I have to change something? The devices are LUKS encrypted LVM
> devices.
Ah, hadn't tried LUKS. What happens if they are _not_ on LUKS?
Let me set up LUKs on my box in the meantime.
>
> The DomU kernel is a 2.6.36.4 vanilla kernel. I noticed that I can’t
> use a newer kernel. Every kernel > 2.6.36 crashes the DomU
> immediatley (I don’t even get a console). The log said that DomU was
> crashing too fast, so it was disabled to avoid loops. This happens
> with 2.6.34.8 as Dom0 kernel and with 3.0-rc2.
Can you boot it with 'earlyprintk=xenboot debug loglevel=10' please?
Are you using a special version of .config? Is it available somewhere?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 16:12 Linux 3.0-rc1 - what Xen components went in Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-01 6:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Joseph Glanville
2011-06-16 9:48 ` Stephan Seitz
2011-06-16 15:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-06-16 17:31 ` Stephan Seitz
2011-06-16 18:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-30 11:16 ` Stephan Seitz
2011-07-17 15:28 ` Problem with vfb at Xen 4.1 Dom0 ( 3.0.0-5-generic ) Ubuntu 11.10 (alpha 2) Boris Derzhavets
2011-07-18 11:35 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-18 12:29 ` Boris Derzhavets
2011-07-18 12:40 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-18 13:45 ` Boris Derzhavets
2011-07-18 16:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-19 16:12 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110616150706.GA6275@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=stse+xen@fsing.rootsland.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).