From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: Don't let in-flight requests
 defer pending ones.
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:03:40 -0400
Message-ID: <20110627140339.GE6978@dumpdata.com>
References: <CA0B31CB.18CDA%pradeepv@amazon.com>
	<1306950593.32587.26.camel@ramone>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1306950593.32587.26.camel@ramone>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@citrix.com>
Cc: "Vincent, Pradeep" <pradeepv@amazon.com>, Xen <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> In the case at hand, increasing the ring size was way more productive.
> At which point the queue depth multiplies as well. And I currently
> expect that the longer it gets the more urgent the issue you describe
> will be.

You wouldn't have patches for that somewhere tucked away? I am going over
the patches for 3.1 xen-blkback and was thinking to have them all queued up and
test them all at once..