From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: HYBRID: PV in HVM container Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:56:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20110628105623.1ec036e2@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <20110627122404.23d2d0ce@mantra.us.oracle.com> <1309249917.32717.252.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1309249917.32717.252.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:31:57 +0100 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 20:24 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Cheers!! I got PV in HVM container prototype working with single > > VCPU (pinned to a cpu). Basically, I create a VMX container just > > like for HVM guest (with some differences that I'll share soon when > > I clean up the code). The PV guest starts in Protected mode with > > the usual entry point startup_xen(). > > Great stuff! I've been eagerly awaiting this functionality ;-) > > Do you have any timeline for when you think you might post the code? > > I presume you managed to avoid bouncing through the hypervisor for > syscalls? Yup, that was the primary goal. DB benchmarks suffered quite a bit because of syscall overhead. thanks, Mukesh