From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
<Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>George,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: HYBRID: PV in HVM container
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:32:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110628113205.1a3c5988@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA2F4550.1D251%keir.xen@gmail.com>
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:46:08 +0100
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28/06/2011 02:51, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> wrote:
> > Hi Keir,
> >
> > Actually, I modified the PVops guest. The changes in the pvops are
> > minimal and mostly confied to xen specific files. So I think it has
> > a fair shot of being upstreamed, at least, worth a shot. I will run
> > them by Jeremy/Konrad and get their opinions.
>
> Well, maybe. But we now have HVM guests, PV guests, and PV-HVM
> guests. I'm not sure that adding explicitly HVM-PV guests as well
> isn't just a bloody mess.
Could we perhaps define a HYBRID type that will have characteristics
like, this runs in HVM container, it doesn't use EPT, it uses HVM
callback, etc.. We can they modify it without defining any new types in
future, say we find it works better with EPT under certain
circumstances etc.. What do you think?
thanks,
Mukesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-27 19:24 HYBRID: PV in HVM container Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-27 19:36 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 1:51 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-28 7:46 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:30 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 8:35 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 10:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-06-28 10:50 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 18:32 ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2011-06-28 18:39 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:31 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 17:56 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-01 1:54 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-09 1:53 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-09 7:35 ` Keir Fraser
2011-07-28 1:58 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-28 11:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 15:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 16:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 17:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 18:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 18:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 18:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-08-09 8:54 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-17 19:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-07-29 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-17 23:38 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-11-18 12:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-11-19 0:17 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110628113205.1a3c5988@mantra.us.oracle.com \
--to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).