From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Xen-deve] xen/stable-2.6.32.x bare-metal: panic early exception 0e rip 10:0 error 10 cr2 0 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:37:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20110902133703.GB5968@dumpdata.com> References: <4E4D9A90.30800@leuphana.de> <4E600A57.9040208@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: M A Young Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:44:31AM +0100, M A Young wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > >On 09/01/2011 02:29 PM, M A Young wrote: > >>On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, M A Young wrote: > >> > >>>On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Andreas Olsowski wrote: > >>> > >>>>Source: > >>>>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git > >>>> > >>>>Tested branches: > >>>>xen/stable-2.6.32.x > >>>>xen/next-2.6.32.x > >>>> > >>>>When trying to boot the current kernel bare-metal it will not load > >>>>properly, instead i am prompted with: > >>>> > >>>>panic early exception 0e rip 10:0 error 10 cr2 0 > >>> > >>>I am seeing this as well. I have been trying to narrow it down a bit, > >>>and it seems to me that the bug was introduced somewhere between > >>>xen-2.6.32.39 and xen-2.6.32.42. > >> > >>xen-2.6.32.40 also crashes. I think that means that it is either > >>commits c3dd7941354fa96a71f2613e2c7a1b215fa175dc or > >>280802657fb95c52bb5a35d43fea60351883b2af (or something in the stable > >>kernel or else compile differences though both are unlikely). I am > >>still working on this to confirm which patch it is. > > > >280802657fb95c5 is unlikely - that's just a blkback change. > > > >c3dd7941354fa96 looks plausible. > > Yes, xen-2.6.32.40 with c3dd7941354fa96a71f2613e2c7a1b215fa175dc > reverted will boot on bare metal. bare metal. Yes, it won't work under that - at least not in that state. Jeremy, can you revert that patch please - it was fixing one instance of machines - and it looks to be breaking many more. Grrrrrr