xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: AMD IOMMU intremap tables and IOAPICs
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:06:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906160612.GA12835@ocelot.phlegethon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E664228.5070606@citrix.com>

At 16:54 +0100 on 06 Sep (1315328056), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/09/11 16:47, George Dunlap wrote:
> > Wei,
> >
> > Quick question:  Am I reading the code correctly, that even with
> > per-device interrupt remap tables, that GSIs are accounted to the
> > intremap table of the corresponding IOAPIC, presumably because the
> > IOMMU sees interrupts generated as GSIs as coming from the IOAPIC?  In
> > that case, then we need all devices sharing the same IOAPIC must not
> > have any vector collisions.  Is that correct?
> 
> Based on the ICH10 IO-APIC documentation with respect to auto EOIs, we
> cant have any two IRQs across any IO-APICs sharing a vector,
> irrespective of IOMMU or not.  (Because the EOI'ing an IO-APIC entry
> only takes account of vector and not destination)

If this is the case, is there any point in having per-CPU IDTs?  
Or per-device remapping tables?

Tim.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-06 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-06 15:47 AMD IOMMU intremap tables and IOAPICs George Dunlap
2011-09-06 15:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-06 15:57   ` George Dunlap
2011-09-06 16:03     ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-06 16:00       ` George Dunlap
2011-09-06 16:06   ` Tim Deegan [this message]
2011-09-06 16:03     ` George Dunlap
2011-09-06 16:13     ` Keir Fraser
2011-09-06 16:25     ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-07 11:18 ` Wei Wang2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110906160612.GA12835@ocelot.phlegethon.org \
    --to=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).