From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@mimuw.edu.pl>, JBeulich@novell.com
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: blkfront problem in pvops kernel when barriers enabled
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:55:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906165522.GD28971@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906163213.GC5264@dumpdata.com>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:32:13PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Pvops block frontend (tested vanilla 3.0.3, 3.1rc2, Konrad's testing
> > branch) produces a lot of I/O errors when barriers are enabled but
> > cannot be used.
> >
> > On xenlinux I've got message:
> > [ 15.036921] blkfront: xvdb: empty write barrier op failed
> > [ 15.036936] blkfront: xvdb: barriers disabled
> >
> > and after that, everything works fine. On pvops - I/O errors.
> > As backend I've used 2.6.38.3 xenlinux (based on SUSE package) and
> > 3.1rc2 with same result.
>
> Hm, and the 'feature-barrier' was enabled on in those backends?
> That is really bizzare considering that those backends don't actually
> support WRITE_BARRIER anymore.
To be exact:
http://lwn.net/Articles/399715/ so in 2.6.37-era ish the WRITE_BARRIER
functionality got ripped out.
And the LFS summit in 2010 had more details:
http://lwn.net/Articles/399148/
"That led, eventually, to one of the clearest decisions in the first
day of the summit: barriers, as such, will be no more."
And WRITE_BARRIER != WRITE_FLUSH so if the SuSE backend is using it
as so - then there is a bug in there.
In the 3.1-rc2 upstream kernel there should be absolutly no hint
of 'feature-barrier' in the _backend_ code (it is OK for it to be
in the frontend code).
Can you confirm where you got your sources?
P.S.
There should be a backwards compatible way of implementing the
'feature-barrier' in the block backend of 3.0 and further kernels..
but nobody has stepped up in implementing it.
Also, one more thing - are you sure you are using the block backend?
You might be using the QEMU qdisk?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 10:49 blkfront problem in pvops kernel when barriers enabled Marek Marczykowski
2011-09-06 16:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-06 16:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-09-06 17:47 ` Marek Marczykowski
2011-09-06 17:16 ` Marek Marczykowski
2011-09-07 1:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-07 9:50 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-07 10:19 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-07 17:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-08 8:06 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 13:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-07 17:34 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-07 17:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-07 18:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-07 19:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-01 19:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110906165522.GD28971@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=marmarek@mimuw.edu.pl \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).