From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geiger Subject: Re: Signed GPLPV drivers available for download Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:10:36 +0200 Message-ID: <201109150110.36522.tobias.geiger@vido.info> References: <201109090950.05043.muehlenhoff@univention.de> <201109141814.29461.tobias.geiger@vido.info> <20110914222641.GU12984@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110914222641.GU12984@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Disk /dev/nbd0: 193.3 GB, 193273528320 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 23497 cylinders, total 377487360 sectors Units =3D sectors of 1 * 512 =3D 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x047328a3 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/nbd0p1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/nbd0p2 206848 377485311 188639232 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT seems to be proper aligned... Am Donnerstag 15 September 2011, 00:26:41 schrieb Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:14:28PM +0200, Tobias Geiger wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 14. September 2011, 18:03:04 schrieb Tobias Geiger: > > > - really better read-performance WITH gplpv, but much worse > >=20 > > > write-performance: here is the performance without gplpv: > > well, after reviewing my own screenshots i declare even the > > readperformance gets worse after installing GPLPV drivers, not only the > > writeperformance... > >=20 > > Any hints on that ?! i remember this not being the case with windows xp > > iirc... >=20 > Are your partitions aligned properly? if not, that'll cause a big > performance hit. >=20 > -- Pasi