From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Deegan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] v2: memshare/xenpaging/xen-access fixes for xen-unstable Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20110916112047.GA95880@ocelot.phlegethon.org> References: <20110912135717.GC79171@ocelot.phlegethon.org> <20081.53649.196648.92906@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081.53649.196648.92906@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: Olaf Hering , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 11:21 +0100 on 15 Sep (1316085665), Ian Jackson wrote: > Tim Deegan writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] v2: memshare/xenpaging/xen-access fixes for xen-unstable"): > > At 11:57 +0200 on 08 Sep (1315483028), Olaf Hering wrote: > > > The following two patches allow the parallel use of memsharing, > > > xenpaging and xen-access by using an independent ring buffer for > > > each feature. > > > > > > Please review. > > > > As I said, the Xen side looks fine but I'd like the opinion of the tools > > maintainers about the API changes before I apply anything. Maybe this > > is something that can happen at the hackathon. > > >From the tools point of view: > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson > > Tim, I wasn't sure if your message was an ack from the hypervisor > point of view, so I haven't actually applied these patches. OK, I've applied them now. Cheers, Tim.