From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 of 3] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:19:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111230111943.GA27359@ocelot.phlegethon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EFC8C73020000780007C160@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
At 15:51 +0000 on 29 Dec (1325173875), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >This is part of the "min" option which is trying to have the least
> >possible impact. The idea is to have this in low memory, use the
> >"console_to_ring" boot option to copy dom0 dmesg into conring, and pass
> >its physical address and size in a crash note, so that the crash kernel
> >environment grab it all.
>
> Why is the console ring *that* important? I would have thought
> that proper register values and stack contents are much more
> significant for analysis of a crash.
The console ring has been _very_ useful in diagnosing bugs from field
reports, especially things like guest-level watchdog timeouts and
refcounting errors that cause a crash after the interesting event has
passed. If nothing else it lets you verify the user's description of
the system, and saves a round-trip of 'please try to set up a serial
logger and reproduce the bug').
(I agree, though, that using a 64-bit crash kernel would be a much
better idea).
Tim.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-30 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-29 15:51 [PATCH 3 of 3] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory Jan Beulich
2011-12-30 11:19 ` Tim Deegan [this message]
2011-12-31 0:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-12-31 7:38 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-03 11:58 ` Andrew Cooper
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-22 17:36 [PATCH 0 of 3] KEXEC fixes Andrew Cooper
2011-12-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] KEXEC: Allocate crash structures in low memory Andrew Cooper
2011-12-22 18:09 ` David Vrabel
2011-12-22 18:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-12-23 9:09 ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-23 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-23 11:59 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111230111943.GA27359@ocelot.phlegethon.org \
--to=tim@xen.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).