From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 13] Sharing overhaul V4 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:16:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20120126131645.GA4156@aepfle.de> References: <20120126125435.GB74165@ocelot.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120126125435.GB74165@ocelot.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Tim Deegan Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, andres@gridcentric.ca, keir.xen@gmail.com, Andres Lagar-Cavilla , JBeulich@suse.com, ian.jackson@citrix.com, adin@gridcentric.ca List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Jan 26, Tim Deegan wrote: > Applied all except #12; thank you. > > Tools maintainers, I think it would be a good idea to take #12 as well, > in spite of the commit message saying 'not necessarily expecting it be > added to the tree', in order to have an in-tree consumer of these > interfaces. I havent looked at the tool, but I think that having some sort of (easy to run) test vehicle for the features we have is always good. So also that other tool Andres sent to test access is good to have in the tree. Olaf