From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: RFC PATCH: bring OpenBSD stdarg in line with
	FreeBSD one
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:45:04 +0000
Message-ID: <20120126154504.GA80228@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
References: <20120119161626.GO66164@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120119161626.GO66164@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

At 16:16 +0000 on 19 Jan (1326989786), Tim Deegan wrote:
> Having an absolute path in a #include confuses distcc's pump mode.
> Since AFAICS OpenBSD's stdarg handling uses the builtins, I think we
> should just treat it like we do NetBSD.
> 
> I don't have an OpenBSD box to test on, though. :(  Any OpenBSD
> enthusiasts care to comment?

No complaints, and the new header compiles on OpenBSD, so I've applied it. 

Cheers,

Tim.