xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@lagarcavilla.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/libxc: send page-in requests in batches in linux_privcmd_map_foreign_bulk
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:02:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120126170217.GA13007@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55d685d4f7e551ab7c854c509a63f895.squirrel@webmail.lagarcavilla.org>

On Thu, Jan 26, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:

> >> Why not alloc a separate arr2 array, move the gfn's that failed with
> >> ENOENT there, and retry the whole new arr2 block? You only need to
> >> allocate arr2 once, to size num. That will batch always, everything.
> >
> > The errors for gfns are most likely fragmented. Merging the gfns means
> > they will get a different addr. So the overall layout of arr and err
> > needs to remain the same.
> 
> Ummh yeah, addr is the problem. But as you say, the error for the gfns are
> fragmented, so that seriously limits your batching abilities.
 
> You could pass the whole arr sub-segment encompassing the first and last
> gfn that failed with ENOENT. Successful maps within that array will be
> re-done by the hypervisor, at no correctness cost. I would imagine that
> the extra work is offset by the gains, but that remains to be seen.

Isnt that what the patch does, find a range of ENOENTs and try that
again?

Olaf

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-26 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.1648.1327589466.1471.xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
2012-01-26 16:30 ` [PATCH] tools/libxc: send page-in requests in batches in linux_privcmd_map_foreign_bulk Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-01-26 16:38   ` Olaf Hering
2012-01-26 16:58     ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-01-26 17:02       ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2012-01-27 12:35       ` Olaf Hering
2012-03-26 13:22 Olaf Hering
2012-04-02 16:41 ` Ian Jackson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-26 14:51 Olaf Hering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120126170217.GA13007@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=andres@lagarcavilla.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).