From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] hvc_xen: implement multiconsole support Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:37:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20120127183734.GA10175@andromeda.dapyr.net> References: <1327581807-17276-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1327581807-17276-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > +static int xencons_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev) > +{ > + struct xencons_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev); > + > + spin_lock(&xencons_lock); > + list_del(&info->list); > + spin_unlock(&xencons_lock); > + xencons_free(info); > return 0; > } .. snip.. > static void __exit xen_hvc_fini(void) > { > - if (hvc) > - hvc_remove(hvc); > + struct xencons_info *entry, *next; > + > + if (list_empty(&xenconsoles)) > + return; > + > + spin_lock(&xencons_lock); You take a lock. > + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, &xenconsoles, list) { > + list_del(&entry->list); > + if (entry->xbdev) > + xencons_remove(entry->xbdev); And then call xencons_remove which also takes the same lock. > + else { > + if (entry->irq > 0) > + unbind_from_irqhandler(entry->irq, NULL); > + if (entry->hvc); > + hvc_remove(entry->hvc); > + kfree(entry); > + } > + } > + spin_unlock(&xencons_lock);