From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] arm: few missing #define
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:41:13 +0000
Message-ID: <20120202164113.GR48883@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1202021536090.3196@kaball-desktop>
	<1328200690-26454-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1328200690-26454-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Tim.Deegan@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

At 16:38 +0000 on 02 Feb (1328200680), Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Few missing #define are the cause of a compile failure with
> XEN_TARGET_ARM=arm and XEN_COMPILE_ARM=arm (for example in the case of a
> native compilation). This patch fill the gaps.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
>  xen/include/public/arch-arm.h     |    2 ++
>  xen/include/public/io/protocols.h |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
> index c430cf3..e04c4fd 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ typedef struct arch_vcpu_info arch_vcpu_info_t;
>  
>  struct arch_shared_info { };
>  typedef struct arch_shared_info arch_shared_info_t;
> +typedef unsigned long xen_callback_t;

Can we make all new public interfaces explicitly sized, please?

Cheers,

Tim.