From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kay.sievers@vrfy.org, bp@amd64.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: WARN... Device 'cpu1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. when doing 'xl vcpu-set <guest_id> 1'
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:43:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202174330.GA9311@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120201222250.GA3854@kroah.com>
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:22:50PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:06:01PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > When I bring a CPU down in a guest (which should be the same as bringing a
> > CPU down using the ACPI framework), I get this:
> >
> > [ 14.484206] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> > [ 14.514287] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 14.514318] WARNING: at /home/konrad/linux-linus/drivers/base/core.c:194 device_release+0x82/0x90()
> > [ 14.514354] Device 'cpu1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
> > [ 14.514386] Modules linked in: radeon fbcon tileblit font ttm bitblit softcursor drm_kms_helper xen_blkfront xen_netfront xen_fbfront fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect syscopyarea xen_kbdfront xenfs xen_privcmd
> > [ 14.514557] Pid: 22, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 3.3.0-rc1 #1
> > [ 14.514586] Call Trace:
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810897fa>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810898d1>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813dea02>] device_release+0x82/0x90
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff812dfb85>] kobject_release+0x45/0x90
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff812dfa4c>] kobject_put+0x2c/0x60
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813de6a2>] put_device+0x12/0x20
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813df409>] device_unregister+0x19/0x20
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813e4edf>] unregister_cpu+0x4f/0x80
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff81052c7c>] arch_unregister_cpu+0x1c/0x20
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137f787>] handle_vcpu_hotplug_event+0xc7/0xd0
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137b900>] xenwatch_thread+0xb0/0x180
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810ad3f0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137b850>] ? split+0xf0/0xf0
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810acd16>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff816151e4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8160cc80>] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6
> > [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff816151e0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> > [ 14.515094] ---[ end trace 8f70af51a2e2611f ]---
> >
> > Looking at "commit e032d80774315869aa2285b217fdbbfed86c0b49
> > Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> > Date: Mon Jan 16 14:40:28 2012 -0800
> >
> > mce: fix warning messages about static struct mce_device
> > "
> >
> > it looks like the corret fix is to make the 'cpu_devices' in
> > arch/x86/kernel/topology.c to be changed to be more dynamic
> > (or perhaps have an empty release function)?
> >
> > Is anybody else hitting this with ACPI CPU hot-unplug? Or do I have
> > the privilige of being the first? Oh, I hadn't done a full bisection
> > but v3.2 does not have this.
>
> Does the patch below solve the problem for you?
Hey Greg,
Indeed it does.
For the patch below, please put 'Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>'
Thanks!
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index db87e78..23f2c4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,25 @@ static ssize_t print_cpus_offline(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(offline, 0444, print_cpus_offline, NULL);
>
> +static void cpu_device_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + /*
> + * This is an empty function to prevent the driver core from spitting a
> + * warning at us. Yes, I know this is directly opposite of what the
> + * documentation for the driver core and kobjects say, and the author
> + * of this code has already been publically ridiculed for doing
> + * something as foolish as this. However, at this point in time, it is
> + * the only way to handle the issue of statically allocated cpu
> + * devices. The different architectures will have their cpu device
> + * code reworked to properly handle this in the near future, so this
> + * function will then be changed to correctly free up the memory held
> + * by the cpu device.
> + *
> + * Never copy this way of doing things, or you too will be made fun of
> + * on the linux-kerenl list, you have been warned.
> + */
> +}
> +
> /*
> * register_cpu - Setup a sysfs device for a CPU.
> * @cpu - cpu->hotpluggable field set to 1 will generate a control file in
> @@ -223,6 +242,7 @@ int __cpuinit register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
> cpu->node_id = cpu_to_node(num);
> cpu->dev.id = num;
> cpu->dev.bus = &cpu_subsys;
> + cpu->dev.release = cpu_device_release;
> error = device_register(&cpu->dev);
> if (!error && cpu->hotpluggable)
> register_cpu_control(cpu);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 18:06 WARN... Device 'cpu1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. when doing 'xl vcpu-set <guest_id> 1' Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-23 18:13 ` Greg KH
2012-01-27 0:06 ` Greg KH
2012-01-27 0:22 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-27 0:53 ` Greg KH
2012-01-29 9:22 ` Maciej Rutecki
2012-02-01 22:22 ` Greg KH
2012-02-02 17:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-02-02 18:38 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120202174330.GA9311@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).