From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: vMCE vs migration Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:53:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20120210165338.GA23915@aepfle.de> References: <4F1D4DCD020000780006E593@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <4F1E9F45020000780006EA5E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1327596896.24345.66.camel@elijah> <4F26AD7C020000780006FDC1@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20120209180257.GA13025@aepfle.de> <4F34F96602000078000722DA@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F34F96602000078000722DA@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , George Dunlap , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Feb 10, Jan Beulich wrote: > No, it shouldn't require anything else. Could you add a printk() each > to vmce_{save,load}_vcpu_ctxt() printing what gets saved/restored > (and at once checking that they actually get executed? I was under > the impression that adding save records for HVM is a simple drop-in > exercise these days... The functions are called on both sides with no errors. Regarding these messages, are they guest addresses? (XEN) traps.c:3131: GPF (0000): ffff82c4801d4c6c -> ffff82c480226eb4 Olaf