From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] qemu_calculate_timeout: increase minimum timeout to 1h Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:34:39 +0000 Message-ID: <201202102334.40125.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <4F350047.4030507@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Jan Kiszka , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "avi@redhat.com" , Paolo Bonzini , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > +#ifdef CONFIG_SLIRP > +static inline void slirp_update_timeout(uint32_t *timeout) > +{ > + *timeout = MIN(1000, *timeout); > +} > +#else > +static inline void slirp_update_timeout(uint32_t *timeout) { } > +#endif Shouldn't we be testing whether slirp is actually in use? I doubt many people go to the effort of rebuilding without SLIRP support. Paul