From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] x86/paging: use clear_guest() for
	zero-filling guest buffers
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:41:29 +0000
Message-ID: <20120213114129.GD88765@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
References: <4F300F55020000780007167D@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<4F3902CD0200007800072881@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F3902CD0200007800072881@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

At 11:32 +0000 on 13 Feb (1329132733), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.02.12 at 17:35, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> > While static arrays of all zeros may be tolerable (but are simply
> > inefficient now that we have the necessary infrastructure), using on-
> > stack arrays for this purpose (particularly when their size doesn't
> > have an upper limit enforced) is calling for eventual problems (even
> > if the code can be reached via administrative interfaces only).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Sorry, I completely missed this the first time.

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>