xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 fixes for 3.3 impacting distros (v1).
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:32:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120221033231.GA3776@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329786103.25686.48.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:01:43PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:34 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >    66 66 66 90          	data32 data32 xchg %ax,%ax
> > 
> > [the 66 66 .. is 'nop']. Looks good right? Well, it does work very well on Intel
> > (used an i3 2100), but on AMD A8-3850 it hits a performance wall - that I found out
> > is a result of CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER (too many nops??) being compiled in (but the tracer
> > is set to the default 'nop'). If I disable that specific config option the numbers
> > are the same as the baseline (with CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER disabled) on the AMD box.
> > Interestingly enough I only see these on AMD machines - not on the Intel ones.
> 
> All paravirt ops should be labeled with "notrace" so that function
> tracer does not trace those functions. Have you annotated your new
> paravirt ops with notrace?

No. I hadn't realized that flag existed until your email a couple of days ago - I hadn't
had a chance to see if the notrace would solve this. But let me do that and get
back on this.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-21  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-10 15:34 [PATCH] x86 fixes for 3.3 impacting distros (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-10 15:34 ` [PATCH] x86/cpa: Use pte_attrs instead of pte_flags on CPA/set_p.._wb/wc operations Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-21  1:01 ` [PATCH] x86 fixes for 3.3 impacting distros (v1) Steven Rostedt
2012-02-21  1:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-21  3:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-02-22  2:53 ` Jason Garrett-Glaser
2012-05-10 15:34   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-27 23:17     ` Cyclonus J
2012-06-28 14:28       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-28 14:42         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-28 15:38           ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-29 21:52           ` Cyclonus J
2012-06-29 22:29             ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120221033231.GA3776@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).