From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] PAD helper for native and paravirt platform Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:27:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20120328142742.GD18161@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20120324003111.GA11777@andromeda.dapyr.net> <20120326163558.GC10236@phenom.dumpdata.com> <4F732365020000780007B6A1@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F732365020000780007B6A1@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Jinsong Liu , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "keir.xen@gmail.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Kernel development list List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:42:45PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 28.03.12 at 12:48, "Liu, Jinsong" wrote: > > But just curious, what's the purpose and benefit of exposing mwait to dom0? So that cstate.c can evaluate properly the deeper C-states and xen-acpi-processor can upload them to the hypervisor. > > I remember xen against doing so before. > > And I don't recall anything having changed in that regard. Jan, you Acked the patch in question: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/24/129 > > Jan > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/