From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu/configure: fix CFLAGS handling for
	i386
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:46:27 +0200
Message-ID: <20120331164627.GA23873@aepfle.de>
References: <20120330152436.GA31016@aepfle.de>
 <4F772590.2000603@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F772590.2000603@suse.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Erik Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sat, Mar 31, Andreas Färber wrote:

> This is the only usage of += outside Makefile fragments, so I wonder if
> its use may have been by accident. Is it safe in a POSIX context?
> Or should we better use CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -march=486"?

Now that I look at the shebang, configure is a sh script and += is most
likely a bash feature. So your suggestion for the assignment is correct.

Olaf