From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/vtpm: do not install if vtpm can not
 be build
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:01:46 +0200
Message-ID: <20120403150146.GA8190@aepfle.de>
References: <eed3dbadeb151d9d93cf.1331751730@probook.site>
	<20347.3980.401034.775731@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20347.3980.401034.775731@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Apr 03, Ian Jackson wrote:

> But my second comment is: shouldn't this kind of test be done with
> autoconf nowadays ?

Yes, that was my thinking as well after poking around some more in the
vtpm subdirectory. The header check for example can be done with
autoconf.

Since I more or less enabled vtpm by accident, and currently lack the
time to get this in shape for the 4.2 release, please drop this patch.
I will look at this later.


Olaf