From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
To: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@lagarcavilla.org>
Cc: adin@gridcentric.ca, andres@gridcentric.ca, keir.xen@gmail.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] x86/mm/sharing: Clean ups for relinquishing shared pages on destroy
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:42:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120418124201.GF7013@ocelot.phlegethon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cbdf6b230dc6d2d2964.1334240172@xdev.gridcentric.ca>
At 10:16 -0400 on 12 Apr (1334225772), Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 16 ++++++++++++-
> xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 4 +++
> xen/include/asm-arm/mm.h | 4 +++
> xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h | 1 +
> xen/include/asm-x86/mem_sharing.h | 10 ++++++++
> xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 4 +++
> 7 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> When a domain is destroyed, its pages are freed in relinquish_resources in a
> preemptible mode, in the context of a synchronous domctl.
>
> P2m entries pointing to shared pages are, however, released during p2m cleanup
> in an RCU callback, and in non-preemptible mode.
>
> This is an O(n) operation for a very large n, which may include actually
> freeing shared pages for which the domain is the last holder.
>
> To improve responsiveness, move this operation to the preemtible portion of
> domain destruction, during the synchronous domain_kill hypercall. And remove
> the bulk of the work from the RCU callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@lagarcavilla.org>
I've applied this as a bug-fix. The other two seem more like new
development and I'm less happy about taking them before 4.2
Cheers,
Tim.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-12 14:16 [PATCH 0 of 3] RFC: x86 memory sharing performance improvements Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-04-12 14:16 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] x86/mm/sharing: Clean ups for relinquishing shared pages on destroy Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-04-18 12:42 ` Tim Deegan [this message]
2012-04-18 13:06 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-04-12 14:16 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] x86/mem_sharing: modularize reverse map for shared frames Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-04-18 14:05 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-18 14:19 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-04-12 14:16 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] x86/mem_sharing: For shared pages with many references, use a hash table instead of a list Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-04-18 15:35 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-18 16:18 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-04-24 19:33 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120418124201.GF7013@ocelot.phlegethon.org \
--to=tim@xen.org \
--cc=adin@gridcentric.ca \
--cc=andres@gridcentric.ca \
--cc=andres@lagarcavilla.org \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).