From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@citrix.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC V7 11/12] xen/pvticketlock: allow interrupts to be enabled while blocking
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 01:46:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419201631.5411.15263.sendpatchset@codeblue> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120419201209.5411.43877.sendpatchset@codeblue>
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
If interrupts were enabled when taking the spinlock, we can leave them
enabled while blocking to get the lock.
If we can enable interrupts while waiting for the lock to become
available, and we take an interrupt before entering the poll,
and the handler takes a spinlock which ends up going into
the slow state (invalidating the per-cpu "lock" and "want" values),
then when the interrupt handler returns the event channel will
remain pending so the poll will return immediately, causing it to
return out to the main spinlock loop.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index e2f312f..d2ab57a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -142,7 +142,20 @@ static void xen_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want)
* partially setup state.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
-
+ /*
+ * We don't really care if we're overwriting some other
+ * (lock,want) pair, as that would mean that we're currently
+ * in an interrupt context, and the outer context had
+ * interrupts enabled. That has already kicked the VCPU out
+ * of xen_poll_irq(), so it will just return spuriously and
+ * retry with newly setup (lock,want).
+ *
+ * The ordering protocol on this is that the "lock" pointer
+ * may only be set non-NULL if the "want" ticket is correct.
+ * If we're updating "want", we must first clear "lock".
+ */
+ w->lock = NULL;
+ smp_wmb();
w->want = want;
smp_wmb();
w->lock = lock;
@@ -157,24 +170,43 @@ static void xen_lock_spinning(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t want)
/* Only check lock once pending cleared */
barrier();
- /* Mark entry to slowpath before doing the pickup test to make
- sure we don't deadlock with an unlocker. */
+ /*
+ * Mark entry to slowpath before doing the pickup test to make
+ * sure we don't deadlock with an unlocker.
+ */
__ticket_enter_slowpath(lock);
- /* check again make sure it didn't become free while
- we weren't looking */
+ /*
+ * check again make sure it didn't become free while
+ * we weren't looking
+ */
if (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == want) {
add_stats(TAKEN_SLOW_PICKUP, 1);
goto out;
}
+
+ /* Allow interrupts while blocked */
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ /*
+ * If an interrupt happens here, it will leave the wakeup irq
+ * pending, which will cause xen_poll_irq() to return
+ * immediately.
+ */
+
/* Block until irq becomes pending (or perhaps a spurious wakeup) */
xen_poll_irq(irq);
add_stats(TAKEN_SLOW_SPURIOUS, !xen_test_irq_pending(irq));
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, irq_to_desc(irq));
out:
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &waiting_cpus);
w->lock = NULL;
+
local_irq_restore(flags);
+
spin_time_accum_blocked(start);
}
PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(xen_lock_spinning);
@@ -188,7 +220,9 @@ static void xen_unlock_kick(struct arch_spinlock *lock, __ticket_t next)
for_each_cpu(cpu, &waiting_cpus) {
const struct xen_lock_waiting *w = &per_cpu(lock_waiting, cpu);
- if (w->lock == lock && w->want == next) {
+ /* Make sure we read lock before want */
+ if (ACCESS_ONCE(w->lock) == lock &&
+ ACCESS_ONCE(w->want) == next) {
add_stats(RELEASED_SLOW_KICKED, 1);
xen_send_IPI_one(cpu, XEN_SPIN_UNLOCK_VECTOR);
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 20:12 [PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:12 ` [PATCH RFC V7 1/12] x86/spinlock: replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:12 ` [PATCH RFC V7 2/12] x86/ticketlock: don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH RFC V7 3/12] x86/ticketlock: collapse a layer of functions Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH RFC V7 4/12] xen: defer spinlock setup until boot CPU setup Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:14 ` [PATCH RFC V7 5/12] xen/pvticketlock: Xen implementation for PV ticket locks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:14 ` [PATCH RFC V7 6/12] xen/pvticketlocks: add xen_nopvspin parameter to disable xen pv ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC V7 7/12] x86/pvticketlock: use callee-save for lock_spinning Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC V7 8/12] x86/pvticketlock: when paravirtualizing ticket locks, increment by 2 Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC V7 9/12] split out rate limiting from jump_label.h Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC V7 10/12] x86/ticketlock: add slowpath logic Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:16 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2012-04-19 20:17 ` [PATCH RFC V7 12/12] xen: enable PV ticketlocks on HVM Xen Raghavendra K T
2012-05-01 12:50 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks Ian Campbell
2012-05-01 13:04 ` Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120419201631.5411.15263.sendpatchset@codeblue \
--to=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=attilio.rao@citrix.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).