From: Dieter Bloms <dieter@bloms.de>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Dieter Bloms <dieter@bloms.de>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xl doesn't honour the parameter cpu_weight from my config file while xm does honour it
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:26:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424182633.GA20286@bloms.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20374.53940.224705.242658@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to have a single sched_params struct which
> contained all the parameters needed for any scheduler, and simply have
> them ignored by libxl for schedulers we're not using.
my first version has this type of design and then someone said that this
was not a good design and I have to use union with libxl_sched_*_params.
Anyway I think it is a good design to have one struct with all parameters
and I'am willing to implement it.
--
Gruß
Dieter
--
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
>From field.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120420150012.GB3720@bloms.de>
2012-04-20 15:13 ` [Xen-users] xl doesn't honour the parameter cpu_weight from my config file while xm does honour it Ian Campbell
2012-04-20 15:23 ` Dieter Bloms
2012-04-23 9:46 ` Dieter Bloms
2012-04-23 12:04 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-23 14:22 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-23 15:41 ` Dieter Bloms
2012-04-23 16:07 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-23 19:35 ` Dieter Bloms
2012-04-24 6:05 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-24 12:14 ` Dieter Bloms
2012-04-24 13:09 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-24 14:33 ` Dieter Bloms
2012-04-24 14:51 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-24 16:03 ` Ian Jackson
2012-04-24 16:15 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-24 16:20 ` Ian Jackson
2012-04-24 16:27 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-24 18:26 ` Dieter Bloms [this message]
2012-04-24 19:35 ` Dieter Bloms
2012-04-25 9:07 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-25 10:40 ` Ian Jackson
2012-04-24 13:24 ` Ian Jackson
2012-04-24 13:27 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-24 13:33 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120424182633.GA20286@bloms.de \
--to=dieter@bloms.de \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).