xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: correctly check for pending events when restoring irq flags
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:08:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120426200814.GA1130@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335465846-22229-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:44:06PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> 
> In xen_restore_fl_direct(), xen_force_evtchn_callback() was being
> called even if no events were pending.  This resulted in (depending on
> workload) about a 100 times as many xen_version hypercalls as
> necessary.
> 
> Fix this by correcting the sense of the conditional jump.
> 
> This seems to give a significant performance benefit for some
> workloads.
> 

Will put stable@kernel.org here as well.

Thx!
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> ---
> I'd prefer to do more testing and benchmarking but the gains appear to
> be significant.  e.g., lmbench3's 'lat_proc fork' test has improved
> from 404 us to 357 us (~11% faster).
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S b/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
> index 79d7362..3e45aa0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ ENTRY(xen_restore_fl_direct)
>  
>  	/* check for unmasked and pending */
>  	cmpw $0x0001, PER_CPU_VAR(xen_vcpu_info) + XEN_vcpu_info_pending
> -	jz 1f
> +	jnz 1f
>  2:	call check_events
>  1:
>  ENDPATCH(xen_restore_fl_direct)
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-26 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-26 18:44 [PATCH] xen: correctly check for pending events when restoring irq flags David Vrabel
2012-04-26 20:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-04-27  8:47 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-27 11:41   ` David Vrabel
2012-04-27 11:42   ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-27 11:58     ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-27 12:46       ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-27 13:09         ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-27 13:51           ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120426200814.GA1130@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).