From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= <pasik@iki.fi>
Subject: Virtualization overhead benchmark/comparison
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:59:54 +0300
Message-ID: <20120430115954.GL2058@reaktio.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hello,

Interesting virtualization overhead benchmark comparison between
Native/baremetal, Xen4.1 on Ubuntu 11.10, XenServer 6.0, RHEV3 (KVM), Vsphere5, Hyper-V:

http://blog.exceliance.fr/2012/04/24/hypervisors-virtual-network-performance-comparison-from-a-virtualized-load-balancer-point-of-view/

Focusing on haproxy loadbalancer workload.. so a lot of network IO.

-- Pasi