xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	pv-drivers@vmware.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org, davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] x86info: dump kvm cpuid's
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 15:35:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120501123513.GA8019@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335875225.6038.98.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:27:05PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 17:38 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > The following makes 'x86info -r' dump hypervisor leaf cpu ids
> > (for kvm this is signature+features) when running in a vm.
> > 
> > On the guest we see the signature and the features:
> > eax in: 0x40000000, eax = 00000000 ebx = 4b4d564b ecx = 564b4d56 edx = 0000004d
> > eax in: 0x40000001, eax = 0100007b ebx = 00000000 ecx = 00000000 edx = 00000000
> > 
> > Hypervisor flag is checked to avoid output changes when not
> > running on a VM.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Changes from v1:
> > 	Make work on non KVM hypervisors (only KVM was tested).
> > 	Avi Kivity said kvm will in the future report
> > 	max HV leaf in eax. For now it reports eax = 0
> >         so add a work around for that.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > diff --git a/identify.c b/identify.c
> > index 33f35de..a4a3763 100644
> > --- a/identify.c
> > +++ b/identify.c
> > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
> >  
> >  void get_cpu_info_basics(struct cpudata *cpu)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int maxi, maxei, vendor, address_bits;
> > -	unsigned int eax;
> > +	unsigned int maxi, maxei, maxhv, vendor, address_bits;
> > +	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx;
> >  
> >  	cpuid(cpu->number, 0, &maxi, &vendor, NULL, NULL);
> >  	maxi &= 0xffff;		/* The high-order word is non-zero on some Cyrix CPUs */
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ void get_cpu_info_basics(struct cpudata *cpu)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	/* Everything that supports cpuid supports these. */
> > -	cpuid(cpu->number, 1, &eax, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > +	cpuid(cpu->number, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, NULL);
> 
> You probably want to check ebx, ecx, edx for the signatures of the
> hypervisor's you are willing to support and which you know do something
> sane with eax?

Everyone puts the max leaf in eax - this is what hardware
CPUs do. So I think we can just interpret eax as such.
If someone wants to put broken info in cpuid,
send a patch to blacklist it.

> Also it would be something worth reporting in its own
> right?
> 
> BTW, according to arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h unsurprisingly KVM has
> a signature too 'KVMKVMKVM'.
> 
> >  	cpu->stepping = eax & 0xf;
> >  	cpu->model = (eax >> 4) & 0xf;
> >  	cpu->family = (eax >> 8) & 0xf;
> > @@ -29,6 +29,19 @@ void get_cpu_info_basics(struct cpudata *cpu)
> >  
> >  	cpuid(cpu->number, 0xC0000000, &maxei, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >  	cpu->maxei2 = maxei;
> > +	if (ecx & 0x80000000) {
> > +		cpuid(cpu->number, 0x40000000, &maxhv, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * KVM up to linux 3.4 reports 0 as the max hypervisor leaf,
> > +		 * where it really means 0x40000001.
> 
> This is something where I definitely think you want to check the
> signature first.
> 
> Ian.

kvm lets users change the signature.
But worst case we print one useless line.
Better than not printing something potentially useful.

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-01 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-30 14:38 [PATCHv2] x86info: dump kvm cpuid's Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-04-30 15:03 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-05-01 12:27 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-01 12:35   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-05-01 13:04   ` Gleb Natapov
2012-05-02  9:45     ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-02  9:50       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-05-02  9:58         ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2012-09-05 17:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-06 11:41   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-06 14:48     ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120501123513.GA8019@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).