From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Workings/effectiveness of the xen-acpi-processor driver
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 17:41:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120502214147.GA7670@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA1A79B.5040701@amd.com>
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:31:07PM -0700, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 01:14 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:06:34PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>On 05/02/2012 12:08 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> >>>index a8f8844..d816448 100644
> >>>--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> >>>+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> >>>@@ -811,7 +811,29 @@ static void xen_io_delay(void)
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> >>> static u32 xen_apic_read(u32 reg)
> >>> {
> >>>- return 0;
> >>>+ struct xen_platform_op op = {
> >>>+ .cmd = XENPF_get_cpuinfo,
> >>>+ .interface_version = XENPF_INTERFACE_VERSION,
> >>>+ .u.pcpu_info.xen_cpuid = 0,
> >>
> >>
> >>Is this always zero? This will probably solve the current problem
> >
> >Its a CPU number (not tied in to APIC or ACPI IDs).
>
> Why not use CPU number instead of zero here?
The issue was only with the bootup CPU - so was using the Xen's
bootup CPU number - which is zero (as is Linux's).
>
> >
> >>but I am wondering whether in the future we might hit another bug
> >>because this routine will return the same APICID for all VCPUs.
> >
> > Later on it does a check for 'smp_processor_id()' - and if
> >that is anything but zero it will bail out.
>
> Can you point me to the check you are referring to?
if (!xen_initial_domain() || smp_processor_id())
>
> -boris
>
>
> >
> >So this shoudl solve the problem for the bootup processor.
> >>
> >>-boris
> >>
> >>
> >>>+ };
> >>>+ int ret = 0;
> >>>+
> >>>+ /* Shouldn't need this as APIC is turned off for PV, and we only
> >>>+ * get called on the bootup processor. But just in case. */
> >>>+ if (!xen_initial_domain() || smp_processor_id())
> >>>+ return 0;
> >>>+
> >>>+ if (reg == APIC_LVR)
> >>>+ return 0x10;
> >>>+
> >>>+ if (reg != APIC_ID)
> >>>+ return 0;
> >>>+
> >>>+ ret = HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op);
> >>>+ if (ret)
> >>>+ return 0;
> >>>+
> >>>+ return op.u.pcpu_info.apic_id;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static void xen_apic_write(u32 reg, u32 val)
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-02 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 13:00 Workings/effectiveness of the xen-acpi-processor driver Stefan Bader
2012-04-26 15:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-26 16:25 ` Stefan Bader
2012-04-26 17:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-06 15:23 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-05-07 17:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-07 17:44 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-05-01 20:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-01 22:35 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2012-05-01 22:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-02 0:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-02 1:11 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2012-05-02 9:19 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-02 14:56 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-02 8:36 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-02 15:01 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-02 16:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-02 17:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2012-05-02 17:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-02 21:31 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2012-05-02 21:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-05-02 22:09 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2012-05-03 6:55 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-03 10:00 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-03 12:58 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-03 14:47 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-03 15:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-03 17:02 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2012-05-03 17:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-04 8:00 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-03 16:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-02 21:29 ` Stefan Bader
2012-05-02 8:22 ` Stefan Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120502214147.GA7670@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@amd.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).