From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Andreas Kinzler <ml-xen-devel@hfp.de>
Subject: Re: Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:48:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507194851.GA17718@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336042317.20716.40.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 11:43 +0100, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
> > On 02.05.2012 15:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Did you happen to also compare 3.2.12 and 2.6.34.10 running these
> > > workloads natively?
> >
> > Yes, I tested against 2.6.32.x. Differences exist, but are minor.
>
> Good to know, thanks for testing
>
> The other potential Xen perf thing which just occurred to to me is the
> ACPI power management stuff which the xen-acpi-processor patches in
> 3.4-rcN are fixing. These are necessary to enable things like turbo mode
> so have a pretty large perf impact.
>
> Are you able to try the latest 3.4-rc kernel?
>
> I'm not sure if backports to the kernels you are running exist or not,
> Konrad?
No. But they should be easy to cherry-pick. However, I would suggest
trying v3.4-rc6 first and seeing if that makes a difference.
>
> Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-02 13:11 Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0 Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-02 13:30 ` David Vrabel
2012-05-02 17:01 ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-03 8:32 ` George Dunlap
2012-05-03 10:46 ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-02 13:31 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-03 10:43 ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-03 10:51 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-07 19:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-05-18 16:39 ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-03 11:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-05-03 11:31 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120507194851.GA17718@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ml-xen-devel@hfp.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).