From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: which Dom0 should I use in my regular testing? Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 11:48:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20120529154810.GA21039@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1B4B44D9196EFF41AE41FDA404FC0A100D62CB@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1B4B44D9196EFF41AE41FDA404FC0A100D62CB@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Ren, Yongjie" Cc: "ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:04:40AM +0000, Ren, Yongjie wrote: > Hi Jackson, > Our team spares some effort in regular testing against xen-unstable tree. > I know you are doing some testing against xen. I am testing against Xen 4.1 and everynight latest Linus's tree. > Which Dom0 are you using in your oss test, Konrad's xen.git or upstream linux.git ? I am using Linus' tree everynight. And then whenever I've new patches I use my #testing or just do git checkout linus/master git merge stable/XXX and test that out. > And which Dom0 do you recommend in my regular testing? Uhhh? You mean distro? > (Not sure you are the right person for this question? :-) ) > > Best Regards, > Yongjie (Jay) > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel