xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/mm: do direct hypercall in xen_set_pte() if batching is unavailable
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:07:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605160746.GB24031@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338563694-21915-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:14:54PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> 
> In xen_set_pte() if batching is unavailable (because the caller is in
> an interrupt context such as handling a page fault) it would fall back
> to using native_set_pte() and trapping and emulating the PTE write.
> 
> On 32-bit guests this requires two traps for each PTE write (one for
> each dword of the PTE).  Instead, do one mmu_update hypercall
> directly.

OK.
> 
> This significantly improves page fault performance in 32-bit PV
> guests.

Nice!
> 
> lmbench3 test  Before    After     Improvement
> ----------------------------------------------
> lat_pagefault  3.18 us   2.32 us   27%
> lat_proc fork  356 us    313.3 us  11%
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/mmu.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> index b8e2794..3bf5dfa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> @@ -308,8 +308,20 @@ static bool xen_batched_set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
>  
>  static inline void __xen_set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
>  {
> -	if (!xen_batched_set_pte(ptep, pteval))
> -		native_set_pte(ptep, pteval);
> +	if (!xen_batched_set_pte(ptep, pteval)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Could call native_set_pte() here and trap and
> +		 * emulate the PTE write but with 32-bit guests this
> +		 * needs two traps (one for each of the two 32-bit
> +		 * words in the PTE) so do one hypercall directly
> +		 * instead.

Ouch.
> +		 */
> +		struct mmu_update u;
> +
> +		u.ptr = virt_to_machine(ptep).maddr | MMU_NORMAL_PT_UPDATE;
> +		u.val = pte_val_ma(pteval);
> +		HYPERVISOR_mmu_update(&u, 1, NULL, DOMID_SELF);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void xen_set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-05 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-01 15:14 [PATCH] xen/mm: do direct hypercall in xen_set_pte() if batching is unavailable David Vrabel
2012-06-05 16:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-06-10 10:23   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-11 10:23     ` David Vrabel
2012-06-11 12:29       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-13 16:10         ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120605160746.GB24031@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).