From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/mm: remove arch-specific PTE/PMD get-and-clear functions
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:04:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120613140404.GH5979@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339582845-25659-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:20:43AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> This series removes the x86-specific implementation of
> ptep_get_and_clear() and pmdp_get_and_clear().
>
> The principal reason for this is it allows Xen paravitualized guests
> to batch the PTE clears which is a significant performance
> optimization of munmap() and mremap() -- the number of entries into
> the hypervisor is reduced by about a factor of about 30 (60 in 32-bit
> guests) for munmap().
>
> There may be minimal gains on native and KVM guests due to the removal
> of the locked xchg.
What about lguest?
>
> Removal of arch-specific functions where generic ones are suitable
> seems to be a generally useful thing to me.
>
> The full reasoning for why this is safe is included in the commit
> message of patch 1 but to summarize. The atomic get-and-clear does
> not guarantee that the latest dirty/accessed bits are returned as TLB
> as there is a still a window after the get-and-clear and before the
> TLB flush that the bits may be updated on other processors. So, user
> space applications accessing pages that are being unmapped or remapped
> already have unpredictable behaviour.
>
> David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 10:20 [PATCH 0/2] x86/mm: remove arch-specific PTE/PMD get-and-clear functions David Vrabel
2012-06-13 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: remove arch-specific ptep_get_and_clear() function David Vrabel
2012-06-15 9:41 ` David Vrabel
2012-06-15 10:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2012-06-13 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: remove arch-specific pmdp_get_and_clear() function David Vrabel
2012-06-13 14:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-06-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/mm: remove arch-specific PTE/PMD get-and-clear functions David Vrabel
2012-06-14 18:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-14 18:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-18 9:13 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120613140404.GH5979@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).