From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2 RFC] xen, pod: Zero-check recently populated pages (checklast)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:07:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120614090725.GC82539@ocelot.phlegethon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD205E80200007800088C36@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
At 13:02 +0100 on 08 Jun (1339160536), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.06.12 at 13:45, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> > @@ -287,6 +287,9 @@ struct p2m_domain {
> > unsigned reclaim_super; /* Last gpfn of a scan */
> > unsigned reclaim_single; /* Last gpfn of a scan */
> > unsigned max_guest; /* gpfn of max guest demand-populate */
> > +#define POD_HISTORY_MAX 128
> > + unsigned last_populated[POD_HISTORY_MAX]; /* gpfn of last guest page demand-populated */
This is the gpfns of the last 128 order-9 superpages populated, right?
Also, this line is >80 columns - I think I saw a few others in this series.
> unsigned long?
>
> Also, wouldn't it be better to allocate this table dynamically, at
> once allowing its size to scale with the number of vCPU-s in the
> guest?
You could even make it a small per-vcpu array, assuming that the parallel
scrubbing will be symmetric across vcpus.
Cheers,
Tim.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-08 11:45 [PATCH 0 of 2 RFC] Rework populate-on-demand sweeping George Dunlap
2012-06-08 11:45 ` [PATCH 1 of 2 RFC] xen, pod: Zero-check recently populated pages (checklast) George Dunlap
2012-06-08 12:02 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-14 9:07 ` Tim Deegan [this message]
2012-06-14 14:24 ` George Dunlap
2012-06-14 15:36 ` Tim Deegan
2012-06-08 11:45 ` [PATCH 2 of 2 RFC] xen, pod: Only sweep in an emergency, and only for 4k pages George Dunlap
2012-06-14 9:11 ` Tim Deegan
2012-06-14 12:42 ` George Dunlap
2012-06-14 13:13 ` Tim Deegan
2012-06-14 13:32 ` George Dunlap
2012-06-14 9:12 ` [PATCH 0 of 2 RFC] Rework populate-on-demand sweeping Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120614090725.GC82539@ocelot.phlegethon.org \
--to=tim@xen.org \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).