From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/p2m: Optimize the get_phys_to_machine function a bit.
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:14:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120709161448.GA17595@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFAFBA4.4050603@citrix.com>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:41:24PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 03/07/12 16:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Running perf tells me that the check for p2m_identity
> > is done a lot - more than it should.
>
> This patch doesn't change the how often the check is done. Is this just
> bad wording of the description?
Its bad wording plus it really does not change the assmebler code - I thought
it did but since there is only one "if" case it does not matter how
much I put unlikely in front of it - it is the only branch condition.
Perhaps if I make the code be put in a variable (register) that would
optimize this a bit more...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/xen/p2m.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > index 64effdc..161bcdc 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ unsigned long get_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn)
> > * and in p2m_*missing, so returning the INVALID_P2M_ENTRY
> > * would be wrong.
> > */
> > - if (p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity)
> > + if (unlikely(p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity))
> > return IDENTITY_FRAME(pfn);
> >
> > return p2m_top[topidx][mididx][idx];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-09 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 15:40 [PATCH] various Xen fixes for v3.6 (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] xen/p2m: Optimize the get_phys_to_machine function a bit Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-09 15:41 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-07-09 16:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] xen/perf: Define .glob for the different hypercalls Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 16:07 ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-03 16:14 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-07-03 16:17 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-03 17:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <4FF334E9020000780008D610@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
2012-07-03 17:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] xen/acpi: Fix potential memory leak Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] xen/hvc: Fix up checks when the info is allocated Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 16:11 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <4FF335C6020000780008D613@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
2012-07-03 17:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120709161448.GA17595@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).