xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: nr_irqs_gsi
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:36:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712133637.GC5204@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFE33A9.3060203@oracle.com>

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:17:13AM +0800, Joe Jin wrote:
> On 07/11/12 22:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:42:10AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/07/12 04:31, Joe Jin wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> IHAC whose server have 12 NICs, but when bring up found the 12 NIC not be
> >>> enabled, I found below from xm-dmesg
> >>> (XEN) physdev.c:122: dom0: map invalid irq 55
> >>>
> >>> The corresponding codes:
> >>>
> >>> 115     /* Verify or get irq. */
> >>> 116     switch ( map->type )
> >>> 117     {
> >>> 118     case MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_GSI:
> >>> 119         if ( map->index < 0 || map->index >= nr_irqs_gsi )
> >>> 120         {
> >>> 121             dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, "dom%d: map invalid irq %d\n",
> >>> 122                     d->domain_id, map->index);
> >>> 123             ret = -EINVAL;
> >>> 124             goto free_domain;
> >>> 125         }
> >>> 126 
> >>>
> >>> Log all info to xm-dmesg I got:
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> >>> (XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[32])
> >>> (XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec80000, GSI 32-55
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
> >>> (XEN) Enabling APIC mode:  Phys.  Using 2 I/O APICs
> >>> (XEN) ACPI: HPET id: 0x8086a301 base: 0xfed00000
> >>> (XEN) PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 255
> >>> (XEN) PCI: MCFG area at e0000000 reserved in E820
> >>> (XEN) ERST table is invalid
> >>> (XEN) Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
> >>> (XEN) IRQ limits: 55 GSI, 3033 MSI/MSI-X
> >>> (XEN) Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit)
> >>>
> >>> nr_irqs_gsi = 55, 
> >>> So the condition of #119 should be (map->index > nr_irqs_gsi)?
> >>> for GSI irq 55 should be available as well?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Joe
> >>
> >> No.  There are 55 GSIs, indexed 0 thru 54.  You would be introducing an
> >> off-by-one error by changing the condition.
> >>
> >> The more interesting question is why you are attempting to map more GSIs
> >> than you actually have.
> > 
> > Could it be the ACPI DSDT _PRT being confused. Joe, what does dom0
> > print out for:
> > 
> > xen: registering gsi ...
> > 
> > for the devices? (maybe all to see if there is a trend?)
> > arch/x86/pci/xen.c to print out the 
> 
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> Below came from dom0:

Please rerun with 'debug loglevel=8' on the Linux command line. Otherwise
the information is not present.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-11  3:31 nr_irqs_gsi Joe Jin
2012-07-11  9:42 ` nr_irqs_gsi Andrew Cooper
2012-07-11 14:00   ` nr_irqs_gsi Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-12  2:17     ` nr_irqs_gsi Joe Jin
2012-07-12 13:36       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-07-23 13:30       ` nr_irqs_gsi Jan Beulich
2012-07-23 15:34         ` nr_irqs_gsi Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-24  2:03           ` nr_irqs_gsi Joe Jin
2012-07-24  2:02             ` nr_irqs_gsi Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-24  2:25               ` nr_irqs_gsi Joe Jin
2012-07-11 23:56   ` nr_irqs_gsi Joe Jin
2012-07-23 13:42     ` nr_irqs_gsi Jan Beulich
2012-07-24  0:21       ` nr_irqs_gsi Joe Jin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120712133637.GC5204@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).