From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: vif backend configuration times out Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:59:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20120810125950.GA451@aepfle.de> References: <20120806173905.GA26336@aepfle.de> <1344318133.24794.16.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <20120807152502.GA24503@aepfle.de> <1344353581.11339.105.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20120808172809.GA22206@aepfle.de> <1344501152.32142.78.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20120809143406.GA9317@aepfle.de> <20120810074159.GA11792@aepfle.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120810074159.GA11792@aepfle.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Aug 10, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > Indeed, netback_probe is appearently never called in my case. I will > > check why that happens. > > What I have seen so far is that in 4.2+xl the vif driver is not > registered, while in 4.1+xm there is a vif driver registered. Thats so > far the difference I could spot. Argh, I was expecting that required kernel drivers are loaded when needed. But thats not the case. There is a workaround or fix for pvops in 25728:a6edbc39fc84. But this changeset misses at least netbk and blkbk. Any idea why that changeset is now needed? Why did it work for everyone before? Olaf