From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8]: PVH: privcmd changes Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:34:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20120913173420.22b09c90@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <20120815180716.0049bffe@mantra.us.oracle.com> <1347372623.5305.170.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20120912181910.6b0b9d2b@mantra.us.oracle.com> <1347536266.24226.97.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1347536266.24226.97.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:37:46 +0100 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 02:19 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:10:23 +0100 > > Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > > Well, it has to hang off of vma->vm_private. The alternative would > > be to have a hash table by process id or something, again not sure > > if worth it. > > I think using vm_private within a subsystem/layer is ok, what I think > we should avoid is having layers pass data back and forth in that > field. Ah I see your point. Ok, let me play around a bit see what I can do. thanks Mukesh