From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: XEN 4.1.3 blktap2 patches. Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:43:10 +0300 Message-ID: <20120920184310.GD8912@reaktio.net> References: <201208281225.q7SCP1WO017490@wind.enjellic.com> <1346226868.4847.21.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <20120906131834.GV8912@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120906131834.GV8912@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "greg@enjellic.com" , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:18:34PM +0300, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > Hello, > = > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:54:28AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 13:25 +0100, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: > > > Good morning, hope the day is going well for everyone. > > > = > > > The patches to fix the blktap2 issues which result in orphaned > > > tapdisk2 processes and the transitory deadlock on guest shutdown > > > didn't make it into the 4.1.3 release. Updated patches to address > > > these problems are available at the following location: > > > = > > > ftp://ftp.enjellic.com/pub/xen/xen-4.1.3.blktap1.patch > > > ftp://ftp.enjellic.com/pub/xen/xen-4.1.3.blktap2.patch > > > = > > > The patches are designed to be applied in order and have been verified > > > to work against the 4.1.3 release. > > = > > Please can you post these patches as emails with a changelog and a > > signed-off-by. You should also CC Ian Jackson since he is the one who > > does the tools backports. > > = > = > Added Ian Jackson to CC list.. > = Ping? = Do we need a repost here or can these go into 4.1-testing.hg ? = I see xen-4.1-testing.hg has received other backports now. = -- Pasi > = > > The changelog should be clear about the backport status. IIRC one of > > these is a backport from unstable (so the changelog should say of which > > commit and preserve the original S-o-b) and the other is a > > reimplementation since too much has changed in unstable so there is no > > plausible backport (and the changelog should mention this). > > = > > Ideally these mails would be threaded with subjects "[PATCH 1/2] ..." > > and "[PATCH 2/2] ..." so that it is obvious that there is a sequence to > > them. A tool such as hg email will do this for you. > > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Submitting_Xen_Patches has some hints on how to > > use it. > > = > > If nothing has changed since the previous posting it may be sufficient > > to reply to that previous postings with a "ping" message and CC Ian > > there. > > = > = > So is repost needed here? = > = > -- Pasi > = > = > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel