Re: [PATCH v1 0/8]: PVH (PV guest with extensions)u

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:16:29PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > Ok, I've made all the changes from prev RFC patch submission. Tested
> > all the combinations. The patches are a bit smaller from before, and
> > couldn't be separated like before, so I can't state whats different in
> > each patch. But, it's not too bad to review now.
> > 
> > As before, they were built on top of
> > fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31 from the following tree:
> >         
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git

I took them for a spin over the weekend and stuck them on top of my
#linux-next - 

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git linux-next-pvh

which worked well as PV guest (dom0, domU, etc). It didn't do too well
as PVHVM guest, but that might be just that some of the 'if (xen..)'
are properly not set or I mismerged badly. The later is probably likely as
I did screw it up at least twice (as you can see from my log).

Hm, let me give them also a whirl on top of fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31

> 
> The patch series is not in a bad state. It is reasonable to aim for a
> merge in 3.8.
> At least the xen_remap_domain_mfn_range, ballooning and privcmd changes,
> which interfaces are going to be shared with Xen on ARM ;-)