From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8]: PVH (PV guest with extensions)u Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:06:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20120924160640.GA21156@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20120921121202.3163c379@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20120924152951.GA1458@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120924152951.GA1458@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:29:51AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:16:29PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Ok, I've made all the changes from prev RFC patch submission. Tested > > > all the combinations. The patches are a bit smaller from before, and > > > couldn't be separated like before, so I can't state whats different in > > > each patch. But, it's not too bad to review now. > > > > > > As before, they were built on top of > > > fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31 from the following tree: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > I took them for a spin over the weekend and stuck them on top of my > #linux-next - > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git linux-next-pvh > > which worked well as PV guest (dom0, domU, etc). It didn't do too well > as PVHVM guest, but that might be just that some of the 'if (xen..)' > are properly not set or I mismerged badly. The later is probably likely as > I did screw it up at least twice (as you can see from my log). > > Hm, let me give them also a whirl on top of fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31 And with 3683243b2c551e58082b179fd153c7d43ddc503b applied on top of it I boots just fine. So I had to mess up the merge somehow. > > > > > The patch series is not in a bad state. It is reasonable to aim for a > > merge in 3.8. > > At least the xen_remap_domain_mfn_range, ballooning and privcmd changes, > > which interfaces are going to be shared with Xen on ARM ;-)